ABSTRACT
Aim: Arterial involvement has been implicated in the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19). Fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging is a valuable tool for the assessment of aortic inflammation and is a predictor of outcome. We sought to prospectively assess the presence of aortic inflammation and its time-dependent trend in patients with COVID-19. Method(s): Between November 2020 and May 2021, in this pilot, casecontrol study, we recruited 20 patients with severe or critical COVID-19 (mean age of 59+/-12 years), while 10 age and sex-matched individuals served as the control group. Aortic inflammation was assessed by measuring 18F-FDG uptake in PET/CT performed 20-120 days post-admission. Global aortic target to background ratio (GLA-TBR) was calculated as the sum of TBRs of ascending and descending aorta, aortic arch, and abdominal aorta divided by 4. Index aortic segment TBR (IAS-TBR) was designated as the aortic segment with the highest TBR. Result(s): There was no significant difference in aortic 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake between patients and controls (GLA-TBR: 1.46 [1.40-1.57] vs. 1.43 [1.32-1.70], respectively, p=0.422 and IAS-TBR: 1.60 [1.50-1.67] vs. 1.50 [1.42-1.61], respectively, p=0.155). There was a moderate correlation between aortic TBR values (both GLA and IAS) and time distance from admission to 18F-FDG PET-CT scan (Spearman's rho=-0.528, p=0.017 and Spearman's rho=-0.480, p=0.032, respectively), Figure 1. Patients who were scanned less than or equal to 60 days from admission (n=11) had significantly higher GLA-TBR values compared to patients that were examined more than 60 days post-admission (GLA-TBR: 1.53 [1.42-1.60] vs. 1.40 [1.33-1.45], respectively, p=0.016 and IAS-TBR: 1.64 [1.51-1.74] vs. 1.52 [1.46-1.60], respectively, p=0.038). There was a significant difference in IAS-TBR between patients scanned <=60 days and controls (1.64 [1.51-1.74] vs. 1.50 [1.41-1.61], p=0.036), Figure 2. Conclusion(s): This is the first study suggesting that aortic inflammation, as assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, is increased in the early post-COVID phase in patients with severe or critical COVID-19 and largely resolves over time. Our findings may have important implications for the understanding of the course of the disease and for improving our preventive and therapeutic strategies.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To fight the COVID-19 pandemic, messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines were the first to be adopted by vaccination programs worldwide. We sought to investigate the short-term effect of mRNA vaccine administration on endothelial function and arterial stiffness. Methods: Thirty-two participants (mean age 37±8 years, 20 men) that received the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were studied in 3 sessions in a sequence-randomized, sham-controlled, assessor-blinded, cross-over design. Primary outcome was endothelial function assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), and secondary outcomes were aortic stiffness, evaluated with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), microvascular function that was estimated with hyperemic mean blood flow velocity (HMBFV) of the brachial artery, and inflammation measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and interleukins (hsIL-6 and hsIL-1b) in blood samples. The outcomes were assessed prior to, and at 8h, 24h post the 1st dose of vaccination, and 8h, 24h and 48h post the 2nd. Results: There was an increase in hsCRP that was apparent at 24h after both the 1st dose (−0.60 [95% Confidence intervals [CI]: −1.60 to −0.20], p=0.013) and the 2nd dose (max median difference at 48h −6.60 [95% CI: −9.80 to −3.40], p<0.001) compared to sham. Similarly, interleukins also increased. The vaccine did not change PWV. FMD remained unchanged during the 1st dose but decreased significantly by 1.5% (95% CI: 0.1% to 2.9%, p=0.037) at 24h post the 2nd dose (Figure). FMD values returned towards baseline at 48h. HMBFV remained unchanged during the 1st dose but at 48h post the 2nd dose was numerically lower than the sham procedure but the difference between the 2 sessions was not statistically significant (max mean difference at 48h 8.6 [95% CI: −0.6 to 17.8], p=0.067). Conclusions: Our study shows that the mRNA vaccine causes a prominent increase in inflammatory markers, especially after the 2nd dose and a transient deterioration of endothelial function at 24h that returns towards baseline at 48h. These results confirm the short-term cardiovascular safety of the vaccine. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: None.Figure 1
ABSTRACT
Objective: To fight the COVID-19 pandemic, messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines were the first to be adopted by vaccination programs worldwide. We sought to investigate the short-term effect of mRNA vaccine administration on endothelial function and arterial stiffness. Design and method: Thirty-two participants (mean age 37 ± 8 years, 20 men) that received the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were studied in 3 sessions in a sequence-randomized, sham-controlled, assessor-blinded, cross-over design. The primary outcome was endothelial function assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), and secondary outcomes were aortic stiffness, evaluated with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx@75), and inflammation measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in blood samples. The outcomes were assessed prior to, and at 8 h, 24 h post the 1st dose of vaccination, and 8 h, 24 h, and 48 h post the 2nd. Results: There was an increase in hsCRP that was apparent at 24 h after both the 1st dose (-0.60 [95% Confidence intervals [CI]: -1.60 to -0.20], p = 0.013) and the 2nd dose (max median difference at 48 h -6.60 [95% CI: -9.80 to -3.40], p < 0.001) compared to sham. The vaccine did not change PWV or AIx@75. FMD remained unchanged during the 1st dose but decreased significantly by 1.5% (95% CI: 0.1% to 2.9%, p = 0.037) at 24 h post the 2nd dose. FMD values returned towards baseline at 48 h. Conclusions: Our study shows that the mRNA vaccine causes a prominent increase in inflammatory markers, especially after the 2nd dose, and a transient deterioration of endothelial function at 24 h that returns towards baseline at 48 h. These results confirm the short-term cardiovascular safety of the vaccine.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, along with implementation of lockdown and strict public movement restrictions, in Greece has affected hospital visits and admissions. We aimed to investigate trends of cardiac disease admissions during the outbreak of the pandemic and possible associations with the applied restrictive measures. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study. METHODS: Data for 4970 patients admitted via the cardiology emergency department (ED) across 3 large-volume urban hospitals in Athens and 2 regional/rural hospitals from February 3, 2020, up to April 12 were recorded. Data from the equivalent (for the COVID-19 outbreak) time period of 2019 and from the postlockdown time period were also collected. RESULTS: A falling trend of cardiology ED visits and hospital admissions was observed starting from the week when the restrictive measures due to COVID-19 were implemented. Compared with the pre-COVID-19 outbreak time period, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [145 (29/week) vs. 60 (12/week), -59%, P < 0.001], ST elevation myocardial infarction [46 (9.2/week) vs. 21 (4.2/week), -54%, P = 0.002], and non-ST elevation ACS [99 cases (19.8/week) vs. 39 (7.8/week), -60% P < 0.001] were reduced at the COVID-19 outbreak time period. Reductions were also noted for heart failure worsening and arrhythmias. The ED visits in the postlockdown period were significantly higher than in the COVID-19 outbreak time period (1511 vs 660; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data show significant drops in cardiology visits and admissions during the COVID-19 outbreak time period. Whether this results from restrictive measures or depicts a true reduction of cardiac disease cases warrants further investigation.